Head-to-Head Evaluation
Shire System vs Infor EAM (Hexagon)
Technical comparison of implementation lead time, starting price tiers, mobile UX scores, and target operational scales.
Shire System
Leading UK maintenance and facility management software.
Starts at $35 / user / month
Implementation: 1 to 3 weeks
Infor EAM (Hexagon)
Enterprise Asset Management engineered to maximize capital asset performance.
Starts at Custom Enterprise Quote
Implementation: 3 to 6 weeks
Procurement Battlecard
Side-by-Side Technical Evaluation
| Dimension | Shire System | Infor EAM (Hexagon) |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | ||
| Implementation Lead Time | 1 to 3 weeks | 3 to 6 weeks |
| Starting Price | $35 / user / month | Custom Enterprise Quote |
| Mobile App Rating | ★ 4.3 / 5.0 | ★ 3.8 / 5.0 |
| Free Trial Availability | Yes (Full Access) | Demo on Request |
| Deployment Format | Cloud/SaaS, On-Premise, Mobile-First | Cloud/SaaS, On-Premise, Hybrid |
| Target Facility Scale | Small (1-50), Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+) | Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+) |
| Top Strength | Very easy to set up and use | Unrivaled enterprise scalability handling millions of assets worldwide |
| Primary Limitation | Lacks advanced predictive/IoT capabilities | Demands substantial implementation budgets and specialized consulting teams |
How to Choose Between Shire System and Infor EAM (Hexagon)
Choose Shire System If:
Manufacturing, Education, Healthcare maintenance and reliability teams.
Choose Infor EAM (Hexagon) If:
Manufacturing, Oil & Gas, Utilities & Energy maintenance and reliability teams.
Need tailored selection guidance for your maintenance facility?
Speak with an Advisor →