Head-to-Head Evaluation

Infor EAM (Hexagon) vs Smartware CMMS

Technical comparison of implementation lead time, starting price tiers, mobile UX scores, and target operational scales.

Infor EAM (Hexagon)

Enterprise Asset Management engineered to maximize capital asset performance.

Starts at Custom Enterprise Quote
Implementation: 3 to 6 weeks
Infor EAM (Hexagon) Review → Website ↗

Smartware CMMS

Intuitive facilities and equipment maintenance tracking platform.

Starts at $35 / user / month
Implementation: 1 to 3 weeks
Smartware CMMS Review → Website ↗
Procurement Battlecard

Side-by-Side Technical Evaluation

Dimension Infor EAM (Hexagon) Smartware CMMS
Overall Rating ★ 4.1 / 5.0 ★ 4.1 / 5.0
Implementation Lead Time 3 to 6 weeks 1 to 3 weeks
Starting Price Custom Enterprise Quote $35 / user / month
Mobile App Rating ★ 3.8 / 5.0 ★ 4.1 / 5.0
Free Trial Availability Demo on Request Yes (Full Access)
Deployment Format Cloud/SaaS, On-Premise, Hybrid Cloud/SaaS, Mobile-First
Target Facility Scale Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+) Small (1-50), Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+)
Top Strength Unrivaled enterprise scalability handling millions of assets worldwide Straightforward setup with fast user adoption across diverse maintenance crews
Primary Limitation Demands substantial implementation budgets and specialized consulting teams Lacks advanced statistical MTBF and predictive vibration analysis

How to Choose Between Infor EAM (Hexagon) and Smartware CMMS

Choose Infor EAM (Hexagon) If:

Manufacturing, Oil & Gas, Utilities & Energy maintenance and reliability teams.

Full Infor EAM (Hexagon) Teardown →

Choose Smartware CMMS If:

Facilities & Property, Utilities & Energy, Manufacturing maintenance and reliability teams.

Full Smartware CMMS Teardown →
Need tailored selection guidance for your maintenance facility? Speak with an Advisor →