Head-to-Head Evaluation

Infor EAM (Hexagon) vs Simpro Asset Maintenance

Technical comparison of implementation lead time, starting price tiers, mobile UX scores, and target operational scales.

Infor EAM (Hexagon)

Enterprise Asset Management engineered to maximize capital asset performance.

Starts at Custom Enterprise Quote
Implementation: 3 to 6 weeks
Infor EAM (Hexagon) Review → Website ↗

Simpro Asset Maintenance

Field service and maintenance management for trade contractors and facilities.

Starts at $35 / user / month
Implementation: 1 to 3 weeks
Simpro Asset Maintenance Review → Website ↗
Procurement Battlecard

Side-by-Side Technical Evaluation

Dimension Infor EAM (Hexagon) Simpro Asset Maintenance
Overall Rating ★ 4.1 / 5.0 ★ 4.1 / 5.0
Implementation Lead Time 3 to 6 weeks 1 to 3 weeks
Starting Price Custom Enterprise Quote $35 / user / month
Mobile App Rating ★ 3.8 / 5.0 ★ 4.1 / 5.0
Free Trial Availability Demo on Request Yes (Full Access)
Deployment Format Cloud/SaaS, On-Premise, Hybrid Cloud/SaaS, Cloud/SaaS, Mobile-First
Target Facility Scale Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+) Small (1-50), Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+)
Top Strength Unrivaled enterprise scalability handling millions of assets worldwide Exceptional job costing and profitability tracking on every maintenance contract
Primary Limitation Demands substantial implementation budgets and specialized consulting teams Geared heavily toward service contractors rather than internal industrial plant maintenance

How to Choose Between Infor EAM (Hexagon) and Simpro Asset Maintenance

Choose Infor EAM (Hexagon) If:

Manufacturing, Oil & Gas, Utilities & Energy maintenance and reliability teams.

Full Infor EAM (Hexagon) Teardown →

Choose Simpro Asset Maintenance If:

Facilities & Property, Utilities & Energy, Fleet & Heavy Equipment maintenance and reliability teams.

Full Simpro Asset Maintenance Teardown →
Need tailored selection guidance for your maintenance facility? Speak with an Advisor →