Head-to-Head Evaluation
Infor EAM (Hexagon) vs Proteus MMX
Technical comparison of implementation lead time, starting price tiers, mobile UX scores, and target operational scales.
Infor EAM (Hexagon)
Enterprise Asset Management engineered to maximize capital asset performance.
Starts at Custom Enterprise Quote
Implementation: 3 to 6 weeks
Proteus MMX
Modern web and mobile CMMS with Building Automation System (BAS) integration.
Starts at $35 / user / month
Implementation: 1 to 3 weeks
Procurement Battlecard
Side-by-Side Technical Evaluation
| Dimension | Infor EAM (Hexagon) | Proteus MMX |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | ||
| Implementation Lead Time | 3 to 6 weeks | 1 to 3 weeks |
| Starting Price | Custom Enterprise Quote | $35 / user / month |
| Mobile App Rating | ★ 3.8 / 5.0 | ★ 4 / 5.0 |
| Free Trial Availability | Demo on Request | Yes (Full Access) |
| Deployment Format | Cloud/SaaS, On-Premise, Hybrid | Cloud/SaaS, On-Premise, Cloud/SaaS, Mobile-First |
| Target Facility Scale | Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+) | Small (1-50), Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+) |
| Top Strength | Unrivaled enterprise scalability handling millions of assets worldwide | Direct BACnet and Modbus connectivity triggers work orders from live equipment alarms |
| Primary Limitation | Demands substantial implementation budgets and specialized consulting teams | User interface layout reflects traditional engineering software aesthetics |
How to Choose Between Infor EAM (Hexagon) and Proteus MMX
Choose Infor EAM (Hexagon) If:
Manufacturing, Oil & Gas, Utilities & Energy maintenance and reliability teams.
Choose Proteus MMX If:
Facilities & Property, Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals, Manufacturing maintenance and reliability teams.
Need tailored selection guidance for your maintenance facility?
Speak with an Advisor →