Head-to-Head Evaluation

Infor EAM (Hexagon) vs NetFacilities

Technical comparison of implementation lead time, starting price tiers, mobile UX scores, and target operational scales.

Infor EAM (Hexagon)

Enterprise Asset Management engineered to maximize capital asset performance.

Starts at Custom Enterprise Quote
Implementation: 3 to 6 weeks
Infor EAM (Hexagon) Review → Website ↗

NetFacilities

All-in-one web maintenance and facilities management software.

Starts at $35 / user / month
Implementation: 1 to 3 weeks
NetFacilities Review → Website ↗
Procurement Battlecard

Side-by-Side Technical Evaluation

Dimension Infor EAM (Hexagon) NetFacilities
Overall Rating ★ 4.1 / 5.0 ★ 4.1 / 5.0
Implementation Lead Time 3 to 6 weeks 1 to 3 weeks
Starting Price Custom Enterprise Quote $35 / user / month
Mobile App Rating ★ 3.8 / 5.0 ★ 4 / 5.0
Free Trial Availability Demo on Request Yes (Full Access)
Deployment Format Cloud/SaaS, On-Premise, Hybrid Cloud/SaaS, Mobile-First
Target Facility Scale Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+) Small (1-50), Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+)
Top Strength Unrivaled enterprise scalability handling millions of assets worldwide Straightforward multi-site portfolio hierarchy
Primary Limitation Demands substantial implementation budgets and specialized consulting teams Interface styling reflects older web application standards

How to Choose Between Infor EAM (Hexagon) and NetFacilities

Choose Infor EAM (Hexagon) If:

Manufacturing, Oil & Gas, Utilities & Energy maintenance and reliability teams.

Full Infor EAM (Hexagon) Teardown →

Choose NetFacilities If:

Facilities & Property, Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals, Manufacturing maintenance and reliability teams.

Full NetFacilities Teardown →
Need tailored selection guidance for your maintenance facility? Speak with an Advisor →