Head-to-Head Evaluation

Infor EAM (Hexagon) vs MainBoss

Technical comparison of implementation lead time, starting price tiers, mobile UX scores, and target operational scales.

Infor EAM (Hexagon)

Enterprise Asset Management engineered to maximize capital asset performance.

Starts at Custom Enterprise Quote
Implementation: 3 to 6 weeks
Infor EAM (Hexagon) Review → Website ↗

MainBoss

Time-tested maintenance management software for physical plant operations.

Starts at $35 / user / month
Implementation: 1 to 3 weeks
MainBoss Review → Website ↗
Procurement Battlecard

Side-by-Side Technical Evaluation

Dimension Infor EAM (Hexagon) MainBoss
Overall Rating ★ 4.1 / 5.0 ★ 4.1 / 5.0
Implementation Lead Time 3 to 6 weeks 1 to 3 weeks
Starting Price Custom Enterprise Quote $35 / user / month
Mobile App Rating ★ 3.8 / 5.0 ★ 3.8 / 5.0
Free Trial Availability Demo on Request Yes (Full Access)
Deployment Format Cloud/SaaS, On-Premise, Hybrid On-Premise, Cloud/SaaS
Target Facility Scale Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+) Small (1-50), Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+)
Top Strength Unrivaled enterprise scalability handling millions of assets worldwide Exceptionally cost-effective transparent pricing with no hidden seat penalties
Primary Limitation Demands substantial implementation budgets and specialized consulting teams Windows desktop user interface looks and feels like software from 2005

How to Choose Between Infor EAM (Hexagon) and MainBoss

Choose Infor EAM (Hexagon) If:

Manufacturing, Oil & Gas, Utilities & Energy maintenance and reliability teams.

Full Infor EAM (Hexagon) Teardown →

Choose MainBoss If:

Manufacturing, Facilities & Property, Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals maintenance and reliability teams.

Full MainBoss Teardown →
Need tailored selection guidance for your maintenance facility? Speak with an Advisor →