Head-to-Head Evaluation
Infor EAM (Hexagon) vs Infor MP2
Technical comparison of implementation lead time, starting price tiers, mobile UX scores, and target operational scales.
Infor EAM (Hexagon)
Enterprise Asset Management engineered to maximize capital asset performance.
Starts at Custom Enterprise Quote
Implementation: 3 to 6 weeks
Infor MP2
Legacy client-server CMMS for manufacturing.
Starts at Custom Enterprise Quote
Implementation: 6 to 12 weeks
Procurement Battlecard
Side-by-Side Technical Evaluation
| Dimension | Infor EAM (Hexagon) | Infor MP2 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | ||
| Implementation Lead Time | 3 to 6 weeks | 6 to 12 weeks |
| Starting Price | Custom Enterprise Quote | Custom Enterprise Quote |
| Mobile App Rating | ★ 3.8 / 5.0 | ★ 3.8 / 5.0 |
| Free Trial Availability | Demo on Request | Demo on Request |
| Deployment Format | Cloud/SaaS, On-Premise, Hybrid | On-Premise |
| Target Facility Scale | Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+) | Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+) |
| Top Strength | Unrivaled enterprise scalability handling millions of assets worldwide | Extremely robust and battle-tested |
| Primary Limitation | Demands substantial implementation budgets and specialized consulting teams | Outdated user interface |
How to Choose Between Infor EAM (Hexagon) and Infor MP2
Choose Infor EAM (Hexagon) If:
Manufacturing, Oil & Gas, Utilities & Energy maintenance and reliability teams.
Choose Infor MP2 If:
Manufacturing, Food & Beverage, Heavy Industry maintenance and reliability teams.
Need tailored selection guidance for your maintenance facility?
Speak with an Advisor →