Head-to-Head Evaluation

IFS Ultimo vs Infor EAM (Hexagon)

Technical comparison of implementation lead time, starting price tiers, mobile UX scores, and target operational scales.

IFS Ultimo

Enterprise Asset Management that works for you.

Starts at $35 / user / month
Implementation: 1 to 3 weeks
IFS Ultimo Review → Website ↗

Infor EAM (Hexagon)

Enterprise Asset Management engineered to maximize capital asset performance.

Starts at Custom Enterprise Quote
Implementation: 3 to 6 weeks
Infor EAM (Hexagon) Review → Website ↗
Procurement Battlecard

Side-by-Side Technical Evaluation

Dimension IFS Ultimo Infor EAM (Hexagon)
Overall Rating ★ 4.3 / 5.0 ★ 4.1 / 5.0
Implementation Lead Time 1 to 3 weeks 3 to 6 weeks
Starting Price $35 / user / month Custom Enterprise Quote
Mobile App Rating ★ 4.3 / 5.0 ★ 3.8 / 5.0
Free Trial Availability Yes (Full Access) Demo on Request
Deployment Format Cloud/SaaS, Mobile-First Cloud/SaaS, On-Premise, Hybrid
Target Facility Scale Small (1-50), Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+) Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+)
Top Strength Excellent integration of safety and maintenance Unrivaled enterprise scalability handling millions of assets worldwide
Primary Limitation Can be overkill for organizations not needing HSE features Demands substantial implementation budgets and specialized consulting teams

How to Choose Between IFS Ultimo and Infor EAM (Hexagon)

Choose IFS Ultimo If:

Manufacturing, Logistics, Healthcare maintenance and reliability teams.

Full IFS Ultimo Teardown →

Choose Infor EAM (Hexagon) If:

Manufacturing, Oil & Gas, Utilities & Energy maintenance and reliability teams.

Full Infor EAM (Hexagon) Teardown →
Need tailored selection guidance for your maintenance facility? Speak with an Advisor →