Head-to-Head Evaluation

Hexagon EAM vs Assettrac

Technical comparison of implementation lead time, starting price tiers, mobile UX scores, and target operational scales.

Hexagon EAM

Industry-leading enterprise asset management software.

Starts at Custom Enterprise Quote
Implementation: 3 to 6 weeks
Hexagon EAM Review → Website ↗

Assettrac

Custom asset tracking and mobile maintenance auditing solutions.

Starts at $35 / user / month
Implementation: 1 to 3 weeks
Assettrac Review → Website ↗
Procurement Battlecard

Side-by-Side Technical Evaluation

Dimension Hexagon EAM Assettrac
Overall Rating ★ 4.3 / 5.0 ★ 4.1 / 5.0
Implementation Lead Time 3 to 6 weeks 1 to 3 weeks
Starting Price Custom Enterprise Quote $35 / user / month
Mobile App Rating ★ 4.3 / 5.0 ★ 4.1 / 5.0
Free Trial Availability Demo on Request Yes (Full Access)
Deployment Format Cloud/SaaS, On-Premise, Hybrid, Mobile-First Cloud/SaaS, Cloud/SaaS, Mobile-First
Target Facility Scale Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+) Small (1-50), Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+)
Top Strength Highly flexible and configurable Hands-on hardware configuration services (tags, scanners, mobile terminals)
Primary Limitation Can be overwhelming for smaller organizations Less optimized for automated high-volume spare parts warehouse kitting

How to Choose Between Hexagon EAM and Assettrac

Choose Hexagon EAM If:

Manufacturing, Transit, Healthcare maintenance and reliability teams.

Full Hexagon EAM Teardown →

Choose Assettrac If:

Manufacturing, Facilities & Property, Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals maintenance and reliability teams.

Full Assettrac Teardown →
Need tailored selection guidance for your maintenance facility? Speak with an Advisor →