Head-to-Head Evaluation
Field Force Tracker vs Infor EAM (Hexagon)
Technical comparison of implementation lead time, starting price tiers, mobile UX scores, and target operational scales.
Field Force Tracker
Field service and maintenance management for external contractors and plants.
Starts at $35 / user / month
Implementation: 1 to 3 weeks
Infor EAM (Hexagon)
Enterprise Asset Management engineered to maximize capital asset performance.
Starts at Custom Enterprise Quote
Implementation: 3 to 6 weeks
Procurement Battlecard
Side-by-Side Technical Evaluation
| Dimension | Field Force Tracker | Infor EAM (Hexagon) |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | ||
| Implementation Lead Time | 1 to 3 weeks | 3 to 6 weeks |
| Starting Price | $35 / user / month | Custom Enterprise Quote |
| Mobile App Rating | ★ 4.1 / 5.0 | ★ 3.8 / 5.0 |
| Free Trial Availability | Yes (Full Access) | Demo on Request |
| Deployment Format | Cloud/SaaS, Cloud/SaaS, Mobile-First | Cloud/SaaS, On-Premise, Hybrid |
| Target Facility Scale | Small (1-50), Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+) | Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+) |
| Top Strength | Perfect for maintenance contractors managing client machines across regional plants | Unrivaled enterprise scalability handling millions of assets worldwide |
| Primary Limitation | Less focused on internal heavy machine reliability engineering (MTBF/MTTR) | Demands substantial implementation budgets and specialized consulting teams |
How to Choose Between Field Force Tracker and Infor EAM (Hexagon)
Choose Field Force Tracker If:
Facilities & Property, Fleet & Heavy Equipment, Utilities & Energy maintenance and reliability teams.
Choose Infor EAM (Hexagon) If:
Manufacturing, Oil & Gas, Utilities & Energy maintenance and reliability teams.
Need tailored selection guidance for your maintenance facility?
Speak with an Advisor →