Head-to-Head Evaluation
Shire System vs Proteus MMX
Technical comparison of implementation lead time, starting price tiers, mobile UX scores, and target operational scales.
Shire System
Leading UK maintenance and facility management software.
Starts at $35 / user / month
Implementation: 1 to 3 weeks
Proteus MMX
Modern web and mobile CMMS with Building Automation System (BAS) integration.
Starts at $35 / user / month
Implementation: 1 to 3 weeks
Procurement Battlecard
Side-by-Side Technical Evaluation
| Dimension | Shire System | Proteus MMX |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | ||
| Implementation Lead Time | 1 to 3 weeks | 1 to 3 weeks |
| Starting Price | $35 / user / month | $35 / user / month |
| Mobile App Rating | ★ 4.3 / 5.0 | ★ 4 / 5.0 |
| Free Trial Availability | Yes (Full Access) | Yes (Full Access) |
| Deployment Format | Cloud/SaaS, On-Premise, Mobile-First | Cloud/SaaS, On-Premise, Cloud/SaaS, Mobile-First |
| Target Facility Scale | Small (1-50), Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+) | Small (1-50), Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+) |
| Top Strength | Very easy to set up and use | Direct BACnet and Modbus connectivity triggers work orders from live equipment alarms |
| Primary Limitation | Lacks advanced predictive/IoT capabilities | User interface layout reflects traditional engineering software aesthetics |
How to Choose Between Shire System and Proteus MMX
Choose Shire System If:
Manufacturing, Education, Healthcare maintenance and reliability teams.
Choose Proteus MMX If:
Facilities & Property, Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals, Manufacturing maintenance and reliability teams.
Need tailored selection guidance for your maintenance facility?
Speak with an Advisor →