Head-to-Head Evaluation

Hexagon EAM vs Proteus CMMS

Technical comparison of implementation lead time, starting price tiers, mobile UX scores, and target operational scales.

Hexagon EAM

Industry-leading enterprise asset management software.

Starts at Custom Enterprise Quote
Implementation: 3 to 6 weeks
Hexagon EAM Review → Website ↗

Proteus CMMS

Next-generation CMMS by Eagle Technology.

Starts at $35 / user / month
Implementation: 1 to 3 weeks
Proteus CMMS Review → Website ↗
Procurement Battlecard

Side-by-Side Technical Evaluation

Dimension Hexagon EAM Proteus CMMS
Overall Rating ★ 4.3 / 5.0 ★ 4.3 / 5.0
Implementation Lead Time 3 to 6 weeks 1 to 3 weeks
Starting Price Custom Enterprise Quote $35 / user / month
Mobile App Rating ★ 4.3 / 5.0 ★ 4.3 / 5.0
Free Trial Availability Demo on Request Yes (Full Access)
Deployment Format Cloud/SaaS, On-Premise, Hybrid, Mobile-First Cloud/SaaS, On-Premise, Mobile-First
Target Facility Scale Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+) Small (1-50), Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+)
Top Strength Highly flexible and configurable Strong integration with Building Automation Systems
Primary Limitation Can be overwhelming for smaller organizations UI can feel cluttered

How to Choose Between Hexagon EAM and Proteus CMMS

Choose Hexagon EAM If:

Manufacturing, Transit, Healthcare maintenance and reliability teams.

Full Hexagon EAM Teardown →

Choose Proteus CMMS If:

Manufacturing, Facilities, Healthcare maintenance and reliability teams.

Full Proteus CMMS Teardown →
Need tailored selection guidance for your maintenance facility? Speak with an Advisor →