Head-to-Head Evaluation

Hexagon EAM vs MainBoss

Technical comparison of implementation lead time, starting price tiers, mobile UX scores, and target operational scales.

Hexagon EAM

Industry-leading enterprise asset management software.

Starts at Custom Enterprise Quote
Implementation: 3 to 6 weeks
Hexagon EAM Review → Website ↗

MainBoss

Time-tested maintenance management software for physical plant operations.

Starts at $35 / user / month
Implementation: 1 to 3 weeks
MainBoss Review → Website ↗
Procurement Battlecard

Side-by-Side Technical Evaluation

Dimension Hexagon EAM MainBoss
Overall Rating ★ 4.3 / 5.0 ★ 4.1 / 5.0
Implementation Lead Time 3 to 6 weeks 1 to 3 weeks
Starting Price Custom Enterprise Quote $35 / user / month
Mobile App Rating ★ 4.3 / 5.0 ★ 3.8 / 5.0
Free Trial Availability Demo on Request Yes (Full Access)
Deployment Format Cloud/SaaS, On-Premise, Hybrid, Mobile-First On-Premise, Cloud/SaaS
Target Facility Scale Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+) Small (1-50), Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+)
Top Strength Highly flexible and configurable Exceptionally cost-effective transparent pricing with no hidden seat penalties
Primary Limitation Can be overwhelming for smaller organizations Windows desktop user interface looks and feels like software from 2005

How to Choose Between Hexagon EAM and MainBoss

Choose Hexagon EAM If:

Manufacturing, Transit, Healthcare maintenance and reliability teams.

Full Hexagon EAM Teardown →

Choose MainBoss If:

Manufacturing, Facilities & Property, Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals maintenance and reliability teams.

Full MainBoss Teardown →
Need tailored selection guidance for your maintenance facility? Speak with an Advisor →