Head-to-Head Evaluation

Hexagon EAM vs iMaint

Technical comparison of implementation lead time, starting price tiers, mobile UX scores, and target operational scales.

Hexagon EAM

Industry-leading enterprise asset management software.

Starts at Custom Enterprise Quote
Implementation: 3 to 6 weeks
Hexagon EAM Review → Website ↗

iMaint

Enterprise CMMS software by DPSI.

Starts at Custom Enterprise Quote
Implementation: 3 to 6 weeks
iMaint Review → Website ↗
Procurement Battlecard

Side-by-Side Technical Evaluation

Dimension Hexagon EAM iMaint
Overall Rating ★ 4.3 / 5.0 ★ 4.3 / 5.0
Implementation Lead Time 3 to 6 weeks 3 to 6 weeks
Starting Price Custom Enterprise Quote Custom Enterprise Quote
Mobile App Rating ★ 4.3 / 5.0 ★ 4.3 / 5.0
Free Trial Availability Demo on Request Demo on Request
Deployment Format Cloud/SaaS, On-Premise, Hybrid, Mobile-First Cloud/SaaS, On-Premise, Mobile-First
Target Facility Scale Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+) Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+)
Top Strength Highly flexible and configurable Highly configurable to match specific workflows
Primary Limitation Can be overwhelming for smaller organizations UI can feel a bit dated

How to Choose Between Hexagon EAM and iMaint

Choose Hexagon EAM If:

Manufacturing, Transit, Healthcare maintenance and reliability teams.

Full Hexagon EAM Teardown →

Choose iMaint If:

Manufacturing, Food & Beverage, Fleet maintenance and reliability teams.

Full iMaint Teardown →
Need tailored selection guidance for your maintenance facility? Speak with an Advisor →