Head-to-Head Evaluation

Hexagon EAM vs Guide Ti

Technical comparison of implementation lead time, starting price tiers, mobile UX scores, and target operational scales.

Hexagon EAM

Industry-leading enterprise asset management software.

Starts at Custom Enterprise Quote
Implementation: 3 to 6 weeks
Hexagon EAM Review → Website ↗

Guide Ti

World-class CMMS/EAM by COGEP.

Starts at Custom Enterprise Quote
Implementation: 3 to 6 weeks
Guide Ti Review → Website ↗
Procurement Battlecard

Side-by-Side Technical Evaluation

Dimension Hexagon EAM Guide Ti
Overall Rating ★ 4.3 / 5.0 ★ 4.1 / 5.0
Implementation Lead Time 3 to 6 weeks 3 to 6 weeks
Starting Price Custom Enterprise Quote Custom Enterprise Quote
Mobile App Rating ★ 4.3 / 5.0 ★ 3.8 / 5.0
Free Trial Availability Demo on Request Demo on Request
Deployment Format Cloud/SaaS, On-Premise, Hybrid, Mobile-First Cloud/SaaS, On-Premise, Mobile-First
Target Facility Scale Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+) Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+)
Top Strength Highly flexible and configurable Exceptional planning and scheduling tools
Primary Limitation Can be overwhelming for smaller organizations Steep learning curve

How to Choose Between Hexagon EAM and Guide Ti

Choose Hexagon EAM If:

Manufacturing, Transit, Healthcare maintenance and reliability teams.

Full Hexagon EAM Teardown →

Choose Guide Ti If:

Mining, Manufacturing, Public Sector maintenance and reliability teams.

Full Guide Ti Teardown →
Need tailored selection guidance for your maintenance facility? Speak with an Advisor →