Head-to-Head Evaluation

Hexagon EAM vs FTMaintenance

Technical comparison of implementation lead time, starting price tiers, mobile UX scores, and target operational scales.

Hexagon EAM

Industry-leading enterprise asset management software.

Starts at Custom Enterprise Quote
Implementation: 3 to 6 weeks
Hexagon EAM Review → Website ↗

FTMaintenance

Smarter maintenance management software.

Starts at $35 / user / month
Implementation: 1 to 3 weeks
FTMaintenance Review → Website ↗
Procurement Battlecard

Side-by-Side Technical Evaluation

Dimension Hexagon EAM FTMaintenance
Overall Rating ★ 4.3 / 5.0 ★ 4.1 / 5.0
Implementation Lead Time 3 to 6 weeks 1 to 3 weeks
Starting Price Custom Enterprise Quote $35 / user / month
Mobile App Rating ★ 4.3 / 5.0 ★ 3.9 / 5.0
Free Trial Availability Demo on Request Yes (Full Access)
Deployment Format Cloud/SaaS, On-Premise, Hybrid, Mobile-First Cloud/SaaS, On-Premise
Target Facility Scale Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+) Small (1-50), Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+)
Top Strength Highly flexible and configurable Excellent MRO inventory and purchasing modules
Primary Limitation Can be overwhelming for smaller organizations User interface is functional but not the most modern

How to Choose Between Hexagon EAM and FTMaintenance

Choose Hexagon EAM If:

Manufacturing, Transit, Healthcare maintenance and reliability teams.

Full Hexagon EAM Teardown →

Choose FTMaintenance If:

Manufacturing, Food & Beverage, Plastics maintenance and reliability teams.

Full FTMaintenance Teardown →
Need tailored selection guidance for your maintenance facility? Speak with an Advisor →