Head-to-Head Evaluation
Hexagon EAM vs Field Force Tracker
Technical comparison of implementation lead time, starting price tiers, mobile UX scores, and target operational scales.
Hexagon EAM
Industry-leading enterprise asset management software.
Starts at Custom Enterprise Quote
Implementation: 3 to 6 weeks
Field Force Tracker
Field service and maintenance management for external contractors and plants.
Starts at $35 / user / month
Implementation: 1 to 3 weeks
Procurement Battlecard
Side-by-Side Technical Evaluation
| Dimension | Hexagon EAM | Field Force Tracker |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Rating | ||
| Implementation Lead Time | 3 to 6 weeks | 1 to 3 weeks |
| Starting Price | Custom Enterprise Quote | $35 / user / month |
| Mobile App Rating | ★ 4.3 / 5.0 | ★ 4.1 / 5.0 |
| Free Trial Availability | Demo on Request | Yes (Full Access) |
| Deployment Format | Cloud/SaaS, On-Premise, Hybrid, Mobile-First | Cloud/SaaS, Cloud/SaaS, Mobile-First |
| Target Facility Scale | Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+) | Small (1-50), Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+) |
| Top Strength | Highly flexible and configurable | Perfect for maintenance contractors managing client machines across regional plants |
| Primary Limitation | Can be overwhelming for smaller organizations | Less focused on internal heavy machine reliability engineering (MTBF/MTTR) |
How to Choose Between Hexagon EAM and Field Force Tracker
Choose Hexagon EAM If:
Manufacturing, Transit, Healthcare maintenance and reliability teams.
Choose Field Force Tracker If:
Facilities & Property, Fleet & Heavy Equipment, Utilities & Energy maintenance and reliability teams.
Need tailored selection guidance for your maintenance facility?
Speak with an Advisor →