Head-to-Head Evaluation

Hexagon EAM vs Aquitas Solutions

Technical comparison of implementation lead time, starting price tiers, mobile UX scores, and target operational scales.

Hexagon EAM

Industry-leading enterprise asset management software.

Starts at Custom Enterprise Quote
Implementation: 3 to 6 weeks
Hexagon EAM Review → Website ↗

Aquitas Solutions

Connected maintenance and IoT asset management services powered by Maximo.

Starts at Custom Enterprise Quote
Implementation: 3 to 6 weeks
Aquitas Solutions Review → Website ↗
Procurement Battlecard

Side-by-Side Technical Evaluation

Dimension Hexagon EAM Aquitas Solutions
Overall Rating ★ 4.3 / 5.0 ★ 4.1 / 5.0
Implementation Lead Time 3 to 6 weeks 3 to 6 weeks
Starting Price Custom Enterprise Quote Custom Enterprise Quote
Mobile App Rating ★ 4.3 / 5.0 ★ 4 / 5.0
Free Trial Availability Demo on Request Demo on Request
Deployment Format Cloud/SaaS, On-Premise, Hybrid, Mobile-First Cloud/SaaS, Hybrid, Mobile-First
Target Facility Scale Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+) Mid-Market (51-500), Enterprise (500+)
Top Strength Highly flexible and configurable Bridges the gap between raw IBM Maximo power and practical plant-floor execution
Primary Limitation Can be overwhelming for smaller organizations High total investment suitable only for enterprise industrial budgets

How to Choose Between Hexagon EAM and Aquitas Solutions

Choose Hexagon EAM If:

Manufacturing, Transit, Healthcare maintenance and reliability teams.

Full Hexagon EAM Teardown →

Choose Aquitas Solutions If:

Manufacturing, Utilities & Energy, Oil & Gas maintenance and reliability teams.

Full Aquitas Solutions Teardown →
Need tailored selection guidance for your maintenance facility? Speak with an Advisor →